David Perkins: On "Dead Body"
Though the tone of this is complex and difficult to define, one's first impression is not. To speak of a child's death as a "subtraction" is peculiar and oblique to the nth degree, and so also is calling it a "transaction." Reinforced by their rhyme, the terms inevitably suggest that the boy's death is not much felt by the speaker. "Foul" therefore seems a cold, half-comic hyperbole, and the "green bough" a cliché, though one that renders the semibiblical speech of this traditional community. But on reflection we note that since the speaker is not one of the kin, he can appropriately view the death from detached perspectives, and whatever sympathy he feels may be the more moving because it emerges through and despite his detachment. But no matter where we finally arrive in our response to this poem, the initial shock is chilling.
|Title||David Perkins: On "Dead Body"||Type of Content||Criticism|
|Criticism Author||David Perkins||Criticism Target||John Crowe Ransom|
|Criticism Type||Poet||Originally Posted||25 May 2020|
|Publication Status||Excerpted Criticism||Publication||A History of Modern Poetry: Modernism and After|
|Printer Friendly||View||PDF Version||View|
|Contexts||No Data||Tags||No Data|